There he is laughing at us again. 2015 it was known that the state department expressed worries about Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian collusion. But we were never notified. Why?
This from the far left media source Axios.
Why it matters: George Kent's testimony is "the first known example of a career diplomat who raised concerns internally in the Obama administration" about Hunter Biden's work, writes the Post.
- Kent, a senior State Department official whose role includes overseeing Ukraine policy, also said he was concerned that Hunter Biden's position would make it more difficult for U.S. diplomats to carry out their work — particularly an anti-corruption campaign in Ukraine.
- He also said he raised concerns that the Ukrainian government might view Hunter Biden as a way to gain favor with his father.
- Kent further testified that the vice president's office told him that Joe Biden didn't have the "bandwidth" to deal with Hunter, as his other son, Beau Biden, was battling cancer at the time.
The big picture: Kent's testimony serves as a reminder that Democrats' impeachment inquiry keeps questions alive "about the former vice president’s handling of his son's foreign work at a precarious moment for his 2020 presidential campaign," notes the Post.
So why didn't Obama get involved then? Or did he ignore it like Benghazi?
Source: